Non-parametric tests are basically used in order to work around the underlying assumption of normality in parametric tests. Quite general assumptions regarding the population are used in these tests.
A good example of a non-parametric test is the Mann-Whitney U-test (Also known as the Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon (MWW) or Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test). Unlike its parametric counterpart, the t-test for two samples, this test does not assume that the difference between the samples is normally distributed, or that the variances of the two populations are equal.
Thus when the validity of the assumptions of the t-test are not certain, the Mann-Whitney U-Test can be used instead and therefore has wider applicability.
The Mann-Whitney U-test is used to test whether two independent samples of observations are drawn from the same or identical distributions. An advantage with this test is that the two samples under consideration do not necessarily need to have the same number of observations or instances.
This test is based on the idea that when 'm' number of X random variables and 'n' number of Y random variables are arranged together in increasing order of magnitude, the pattern they exhibit provides information about the relationship between their parent populations.
The Mann-Whitney test criterion is based on the magnitude of the Ys in relation to the Xs, i.e. the position of Ys in the combined ordered sequence. A sample pattern of arrangement where most of the Ys are greater than most of the Xs or vice versa would be evidence against random mixing. This would tend to discredit the null hypothesis of identical distribution.
The test has two important assumptions. The first is that the two samples under consideration are random, and are independent of each other, as are the observations within each sample. The second is that the observations are numeric or ordinal (i.e. arranged in ranks/orders).
In order to calculate the U statistics, the combined set of data is first arranged in ascending order with tied scores receiving a rank equal to the average position of those scores in the ordered sequence (in other words, add the two tying scores and divide by two to give a shared rank for both).
Let T denote the sum of ranks for the first sample. The Mann-Whitney test statistic is then calculated using U = n1 n2 + {n1 (n1 + 1)/2} - T , where n1 and n2 are the sizes of the first and second samples respectively.
An example can help clarify the process. Consider the following samples.
Sample A | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Observation | 25 | 25 | 19 | 21 | 22 | 19 | 15 |
Rank | 15.5 | 15.5 | 9.5 | 13 | 14 | 9.5 | 3.5 |
Sample B | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Observation | 18 | 14 | 13 | 15 | 17 | 19 | 18 | 20 | 19 |
Rank | 6.5 | 2 | 1 | 3.5 | 5 | 9.5 | 6.5 | 12 | 9.5 |
Here, T = 80.5, n1 = 7, n2 = 9.Hence, U = (7 * 9) + [{7 * (7+1)}/2] - 80.5 = 10.5.
We next compare the value of the calculated U with the value given in the Tables of Critical Values for the Mann-Whitney U-test. Here, the critical values are provided for given n1 and n2, and accordingly we accept or reject the null hypothesis. Even though the distribution of U is known, the normal distribution provides a good approximation in case of large samples.
Often this statistic is used to compare a hypothesis regarding equality of medians. The logic is simple - since the U statistic tests if two samples are drawn from identical populations, we can also use it to test whether two group medians are equal.
The Mann-Whitney U test is truly the non parametric counterpart of the two sample t-test. To see this, one needs to recall that the t-test tests for equality of means when the underlying assumptions of normality and equality of variance are satisfied. Thus the t-test determines if the two samples have been drawn from identical normal populations. The Mann-Whitney U test is its generalization.
Explorable.com, Lyndsay T Wilson (Apr 27, 2009). Mann-Whitney U-Test. Retrieved Mar 22, 2025 from Explorable.com: https://explorable.com/mann-whitney-u-test
The text in this article is licensed under the Creative Commons-License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
This means you're free to copy, share and adapt any parts (or all) of the text in the article, as long as you give appropriate credit and provide a link/reference to this page.
That is it. You don't need our permission to copy the article; just include a link/reference back to this page. You can use it freely (with some kind of link), and we're also okay with people reprinting in publications like books, blogs, newsletters, course-material, papers, wikipedia and presentations (with clear attribution).