Ross’ False Consensus Effect Experiments

Explorable.com89.5K reads

Everyone’s got their own biases in each and every occasion, even when estimating other people's behaviors and the respective causes. One of these is called the false consensus bias. Psychologist Professor Lee Ross conducted studies on setting out to show how false consensus effect operates.

This article is a part of the guide:

Discover 27 more articles on this topic

Browse Full Outline

The phenomenon of false consensus effect centralizes on people’s tendency to project their way of thinking onto other people, thinking other people think the same way as they do. This logical fallacy may involve a group or just a sole individual that assumes their own set of opinions; beliefs and impressions are more prevalent amongst public than they actually are.

In the 1977, Stanford University social psychologist Professor Lee Ross conducted a research that focuses on "biases in human inference, judgment, and decision making, especially on the cognitive, perceptual and motivational biases that lead people to misinterpret each other’s behavior and that create particular barriers to dispute resolution and the implementation of peace agreements." (Lee Ross' Profile, Stanford)

Quiz 1 Quiz 2 Quiz 3 All Quizzes

First Study: Methodology

Professor Ross conducted 2 studies meant to show how the false consensus effect works.

In the first study, participants were asked to read about situations in which a conflict occurred and then told two alternative ways of responding to the situation. They were asked to do three things:

  1. Guess which option other people would choose
  2. Say which option they themselves would choose
  3. Describe the attributes of the person who would likely choose each of the two options.


The results evidently showed that most of the subjects had thought that other people would do the same as them, regardless of which of the two responses they actually chose themselves. This validates the phenomenon of false consensus effect, where an individual thinks that other people think the same way they do when actually they often don’t.

Another observation that emerged from the study is that when participants were asked to describe the attributes of the people who will likely make the choice opposite their own, subjects made extreme predictions about the personalities of those who didn’t share their choice.

Second Study: Methodology

A new set of subjects were asked if they would be willing to take a 30-minute walk around the campus wearing a sandwich board that says “Eat at Joe’s”. To motivate the subjects, they were told they will learn something useful by the end of the study, and that they are at the same time free to refuse participating if they do not feel like it.


The results of this study only reconfirmed what has already been found out in their previous study. Among all those who agreed to wear the sandwich board, 62% thought other would also agree like they did. Among those who refused, 33% thought others would agree to wear the sandwich board.

Just like in the first study, subjects in this study made extreme predictions about the type of person who will make a decision opposite to theirs.


The phenomenon of false consensus effect validates the fact that people have the tendency to judge how people make decisions based on how they would make their own. And if other people do decide to do otherwise, they view them as someone defective or unacceptable.


Why We All Stink as Intuitive Psychologists: The False Consensus Effect

Wikipedia: False Consensus Effect

Lee D. Ross Professional Profile

Full reference: 

Explorable.com (Jan 16, 2010). Ross’ False Consensus Effect Experiments. Retrieved Jun 19, 2024 from Explorable.com: https://explorable.com/false-consensus-effect

You Are Allowed To Copy The Text

The text in this article is licensed under the Creative Commons-License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).

This means you're free to copy, share and adapt any parts (or all) of the text in the article, as long as you give appropriate credit and provide a link/reference to this page.

That is it. You don't need our permission to copy the article; just include a link/reference back to this page. You can use it freely (with some kind of link), and we're also okay with people reprinting in publications like books, blogs, newsletters, course-material, papers, wikipedia and presentations (with clear attribution).

Want to stay up to date? Follow us!