Within anthropology and other academic disciplines, there is often much debate between the respective influences of nature and nurture.
Nature refers to what we are born with and includes our biology, genetics, and similar characteristics. In contrast, nurture refers to what is learned, through our cultural community and other individuals. For anthropologists, this debate often centers on the influences of nature and nurture in different cultural elements. Today, most academics—including anthropologists—recognize that both nature and nurture influences affect the human beings and their culture. Therefore, the nature versus nurture debate can be considered a false dichotomy, but it still has an impact on research today. However, now most disagreement between academics is regarding the extent of nature or nurture influences.
Some questions about nature and nurture that anthropologists have and do ask are:
What influence does culture have on personality?
What influence does nature have on language?
Is there any influence of nature on the existence of religion?
Clearly, these are complex questions with no black and white answer. However, it is important to recognize the relative influences of both what is learned (nurture) and what we are born with (nature).
Explorable.com (Aug 7, 2015). Nature Vs. Nurture. Retrieved Oct 06, 2024 from Explorable.com: https://explorable.com/nature-vs-nurture
The text in this article is licensed under the Creative Commons-License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
This means you're free to copy, share and adapt any parts (or all) of the text in the article, as long as you give appropriate credit and provide a link/reference to this page.
That is it. You don't need our permission to copy the article; just include a link/reference back to this page. You can use it freely (with some kind of link), and we're also okay with people reprinting in publications like books, blogs, newsletters, course-material, papers, wikipedia and presentations (with clear attribution).