Categorization of Emotions

The categorization of emotions has long been a hot subject of debate in different fields of psychology, affective science and emotion research. Some theorists approach the categorization of emotions in terms of discreteness while others come up with the groupings on a dimensional basis.

This article is a part of the guide:

Discover 22 more articles on this topic

Browse Full Outline

Quiz 1 Quiz 2 Quiz 3 All Quizzes

Basicality Approach

Emotions that are categorized according to their discrete attributes often fall into two opposing groups: basic emotions and complex emotions. Deemed as biologically fixed, basic emotions are those emotions that are common to all human beings, as well as in many animals. Complex emotions emerge from basic emotions and are the “refined versions” of such. They are more distinctive and culturally specific than basic emotions. However, it is still a matter of debate as to how emotions could be categorized as either basic or complex. Researchers rely on common labels among various languages, characteristic physiological symptoms and facial expressions in identifying basic emotions.

In 1972, Paul Ekman proposed that there were six basic emotions: anger, fear, disgust, happiness, surprise and sadness. After conducting more research studies, Ekman expanded on his list of basic emotions, proposing that the following are also universal to all people: contentment, amusement, embarrassment, contempt, guilt, excitement, relief, pride in achievement, satisfaction, shame and sensory pleasure.

Dimensional Approach

The father of modern psychology, Wilhelm Max Wundt proposed in 1897 that there were three dimensions of emotions: (1) strain versus relaxation, (2) arousing versus subduing, and (3) pleasurable versus unpleasurable. Several years later, psychologist Harold Schlosberg built on the work of Wundt by proposing his own three dimensions of emotions: (1) level of activation, (2) attention-rejection, and (3) pleasantness-unpleasantness. PAD emotional state model is another three-dimensional approach by Mehrabian and Russell. It makes use of scales to measure emotions in three dimensions: (1) pleasure versus displeasure, (2) arousal versus non-arousal, and (3) dominance versus submissiveness. Yet another popular dimensional model was proposed by James Russell in 1977. Unlike the earlier three-dimensional models, Russell’s model features only two dimensions which include (1) arousal and (2) valence (or pleasantness).

While the four aforementioned models are well-cited in the field of psychology, the three-dimensional model of Robert Plutchik is one of the most popularly used models today. The model shows emotions being represented by concentric circles that are divided into two kinds: inner or basic circles and outer or complex circles.

A physiologic approach to emotions, the Cube of Emotion was recently proposed by Lövheim in 2011. According to this model, the different levels of noradrenaline, dopamine and serotonin directly influence the eight basic emotions. The combination of these signal substances lead to the emergence of a specific emotion. For instance, the combination of high dopamine, high noradrenaline and low serotonin levels lead to anger.

Full reference: 

(Oct 10, 2012). Categorization of Emotions. Retrieved Jun 19, 2024 from

You Are Allowed To Copy The Text

The text in this article is licensed under the Creative Commons-License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).

This means you're free to copy, share and adapt any parts (or all) of the text in the article, as long as you give appropriate credit and provide a link/reference to this page.

That is it. You don't need our permission to copy the article; just include a link/reference back to this page. You can use it freely (with some kind of link), and we're also okay with people reprinting in publications like books, blogs, newsletters, course-material, papers, wikipedia and presentations (with clear attribution).

Want to stay up to date? Follow us!